oursolo.net

继广州及其他城市，杭州已经开始使用电动自行车是有限的（10月13日“现代金报的立法程序”）。只有有限的使用电动自行车，可以改善杭州的交通情况？恐怕会有一些限制，就与游戏电动自行车的人的生计。

据统计，在杭州旅游的人，73％的人选择自行车，其合理性，只有三个：第一，还没有扩散到大多数人可以放弃自行车阶段的私家车，两辆公共汽车不太方便对在自行车可以更换点，三个尚未延长骑自行车到杭州，不应该强迫状态。在那些谁骑自行车旅行，对电动自行车近63万个业主，超过10辆，每年的增量数，只不过是合理的，有三个：第一，不须承担私家车的成本在从耳蜗总线罪行负二是，三个自行车减少了厌倦踩踏。此外，电动自行车汽车有一个方便的，但不是卡上，检查，交叉很强的风险等麻烦和负担;价格便宜，只有两三次，高端自行车，自行车经常丢失的情况下，收购一种电动自行车，它成为供市民选择适当的旅行多数的理由。

万时，60多个电动自行车通过在杭州，人行道，机动车和非时间机动道公路开始变得危险。仅限于“20码的速度”，它可以提高到“40码”，但并没有强大的交叉保护，保险，离职后的第一个议案成为人;废旧电池无法处理，在新的污染造成的… …这属于清洁能源电力自行车，在即将进行的城市之一，它带来的疾病。现在就停止立法会，而且肯定不会再容忍了。

但平均每年增加10万，在杭州电动车通过时，至少有6年。这6年杭城的交通状况，是否已改变了这个电动自行车走？例如，为了让巴士更方便，如地铁建设，例如，以更好地解决交通挤塞… …这是最终的访问的情况，立法禁止电动自行车，似乎不存在根本的区别。因此，是否有更好的实现，使电动自行车已变得如此安全和环保？例如，有效的车速限制，如电动车线的划分，例如，要解决废旧电池回收… …这是最终之行的电动自行车案件法律禁止的外观相同的解决。

两害取其轻相比，因为法律禁止电动自行车，他们自然会是立法的真相。然而，轴承超过60万人旅游的问题，那么我们如何解决？允许他们购买私家车，可能或可能不富裕，真的要购买，航交通可能会更糟，所以，他们已改变巴士，可能是行不通的，我们可能没有足够数量的巴士，他们不一定，可以方便足够的速度，因为我们首先应看看杭城可以借鉴公交车专用车道，使他们再由自行车改变，几乎是不可能的，“由一成奢侈浪费建节俭的困难”，其中的原因是不难理解的。此外呢？购买新的电动自行车，总是能够坐了几年。在行业立法禁止，但在不该让购买汽车的立法，立刻成为一堆废铁。什么将是过渡时期，或折旧补偿的实施？我恐怕民生是游戏不能回避。

Electric bicycle with Hangzhou limited livelihood Game

Following the Canton and other cities, Hangzhou has started to use electric bicycles are limited legislative process of the (October 13 “Modern Gold reported”). Only limited use of electric bicycles, can improve the traffic situation in Hangzhou? I’m afraid there will be some restrictions regarding the livelihood of the people with electric bikes game.

According to statistics, people travel in Hangzhou, 73% chose a bike, its rationality, there are only three: First, private cars have not yet spread to the majority of people can give up the bike stage, two buses are not convenient to the point where a bike can be replaced, three are yet to be extended to Hangzhou by bike and should not force the state. And in those who travel by bicycle, the electric bicycle owners of nearly 630,000, and is more than 10 vehicles each year the number of increments, is nothing more than reasonable to have three: First, do not have to bear the cost of private cars on the negative the second is from the cochlear bus line crimes, three bicycles are reduced stampede of tired. In addition, electric bicycle motor vehicle has a convenient, but not on the card, examined, cross-strong risk such trouble and burden; prices cheaper that only two or three times high-end bicycles, bicycle frequently lost in the circumstances, the acquisition of an electric bike, it becomes grounds for the majority of the public adequate travel choices.

10,000 when more than 60 electric bicycle through time in Hangzhou, sidewalks, motor vehicles and non-motorized Road Road began to become risky. Limited to “20 yards” of speed, it can be raised to “40 yards”; there is no strong cross-protection insurance, after the first bill to become nobody; used batteries can not handle, resulting in new pollution … … this belongs to clean energy in the electric cycling, one in the city coming out, it brought a disease. Now made to halt the Legislative Council, and certainly no longer tolerate it.

but the average annual increase of 100,000, the electric bicycle in Hangzhou through time, at least 6 years. This 6-year Hangcheng traffic conditions, whether it has been changed away from this electric bicycle? For example, to allow buses more convenient, such as the construction of the MTR, for example, to better address congestion … … This is the ultimate trip to the legislative ban on electric bicycles situation, it seems there is no fundamental difference. So, whether there had better bring, so that electric bicycles have become so safe and green? For example, the effective speed limit, such as the delineation of electric vehicle lanes, for example, to solve the recycling of used batteries … … This is the ultimate trip to the legislative ban on the case of electric bikes look the same unresolved.

lesser of two evils compared to light, since the legislation restricted the electric bicycle, they will naturally be it legislative truth. However, bearing more than 60 million people travel problems, then how do we solve this? Allow them to buy private cars, and may or may not be rich, really want to buy, and Hangcheng traffic may be worse; so that they have changed bus, may not be feasible, we may not have a sufficient number of buses, they do not necessarily will be convenient enough speed because we should first look at Hangcheng can draw bus lanes; so that they then changed by bike, it is almost impossible, “by Yi-Jian into extravagance by the extravagance frugal difficult”, which The reason is not hard to understand. In addition this? Buy new electric bicycle, always able to ride a few years. Legislative ban on the profession, there is legislation before不该让buy car, immediately became a pile of scrap metal. What will be the transition time, or the implementation of compensation for depreciation? I am afraid that the people’s livelihood are the game can not be evaded. (07-10-23)