oursolo.net

南京，一位年轻的妇女购买了使用6衣柜，她倒在免疫系统和往往是寒冷，诊断为过敏性肾炎医院。通过家具有关部门由17173确定释放的甲醛量过高发现甲醛1次。年轻妇女一纸诉状将家具，家具经营者提起诉讼，市法院，要求赔偿的二八五○○○○○元损失。最近，南京鼓楼区法院作出一审判决，判决家具经营者向原告200.00万元和1.1万元的损害赔偿，退还货款。判决后，原被告没有提出上诉的裁决昨天，已生效。
采购“环保”衣橱后患上肾炎

据介绍，2004年12月15日，当23岁的吴季南京，南京路，江东镇一大型家具购买橱柜门，一个人的名字命名明洋家具经营摊位的1 6名内阁部的观点。李当时告诉她的老板，有正式的家具制造商，在环保使用的材料完全符合，所以不要担心，她的四分之一。季认为，李小姐的老板，然后花了1.1万元的6名内阁购回，并放置在卧室里，但新内阁沉重的化学气味，早上起床后季小姐是头晕脑起来，开始了她的不是太多，思想新家具油漆味重点也将是正常的，没有太多关心。

时间一天过去，家具仍然气味的甲醛排放量大，吴季越来越严重的症状，体质较弱的现象，不断感冒。不久，她发现，许多地方的机构，如出血皮肤过敏症状，立即去医院接受治疗，因为“医生诊断为过敏性紫癜”，药物治疗后，身体状况有所改善。不能最后，在2005年6月她的病情再次被江苏省人民医院诊断，她的攻击从“紫癜性肾炎，”小姐的医院总发病率四分之一遭受6天。据医生介绍，某小姐四分之一的疾病，并有污染源之间的关系。吴

季度发现自己患病的购买新的家具，然后去卖家具17173她的李老板交涉，李开始了她的老板是无权说，让女士季度的证据。经过吴医生进行诊断结论季度看老板李小姐在本季度和家庭的要求下，李老板3900的医疗和其他费用前进元。吴季的状况不能好转后，她转移到江苏省，为中医院治疗，但治疗无效。李小姐季度再次找到老板赔偿问题进行谈判，这一次她彻底失望，老板可能意识到李问题的严重性，不想承担责任，有自己注销的经营部门，并退出了家具出租场地的三十六计，走为城市。

衣柜甲醛释放量的标准，找出不足一倍

李老板，吴季继续住院治疗费用。在绝望中，她季度将是“家具”的问题，南京的产品质量监督检验和质量，6月30日委托检验报告出来，测试结果为：提交样品的测试，甲醛的排放量不符合国家标准GB 18584-2001“室内装饰装修材料木家具有害物质的测量极限甲醛3.0mg排放结果”标准要求/ L时，所要求的标准不能大于或等于1.5毫克/升，足够的甲醛释放量超英尺一倍。家具城

业务皆称没有责任

2006年的8个月，作为网站的所有者和家具的城市出租方季度一纸诉状将李小姐鼓楼区法院起诉，声称她是家具和过多的甲醛严重的疾病在28.53万元的损失。情况下，李老板说，从他对购买家具吴季是事实，但原已取消操作。季小姐之间的所谓他和疾病之间不存在因果关系的法律，而且在购买家具，吴季才从疾病索赔的痛苦。出于人道主义的考虑，他已支付原告3900元，法院驳回了吴季www.focus.cn的诉讼请求要求。被告还辩称，家具城，家具城和李老板之间的柜台处，收取后在合理范围内城市的家具租赁关系，质量监管义务。吴季患有疾病，过多甲醛购买家具并不一定是因果关系，他们的家具，甚至在购买之前过敏性紫癜。为吴结论单方面作出委托鉴定季度，家具城不予受理。因此，吴季损失索赔，家具城不应承担最终责任。

不排除甲醛超过诱因是

情况下，在争议双方，按照吴季申请法院委托肾炎的争议和诉讼家具的因果关系南京鑫盾原告的司法鉴定之间的身份情况，鉴定分析认为：过敏性紫癜是一种毛细血管的过敏性炎性疾病，过敏性紫癜疾病的发生，除了环境因素（气候，花粉，食品，药品，化工原料等）有关其性质作为人体免疫系统功能障碍的结果，和他们密切相关的过敏体质。经过与有关医疗专家咨询，临床确实出现了类似情况，存在的一定程度的临床联系，但迄今为止还缺乏相关的科学基础上，吴季与甲醛肾炎遭受超过内阁之间不应6显然存在直接的因果关系。然而，作为一种特定的甲醛刺激性毒物，不排除其发病的可能性，导致病情加重的诱因。鉴定工作人员还表示，必须满足过敏原的过敏性紫癜，过敏性体质两个条件，这两个条件是必不可少的;甲醛标准的过敏原之一，甲醛加过量导致身体过敏过敏性紫癜，目前原告不能引起疾病的肯定甲醛超标，但不能排除的有毒气体甲醛可能会增加原告或作为疾病的危险因素存在。

的200.000万元的赔偿消费者的青睐

经过几次听证会，南京市鼓楼区人民法院已作出一审判决。法院认为，根据有关证据，被告可以肯定的是，李诉的销售网络，为国甲醛排放限值超级女子家具两次，在产品质量存在缺陷的不合格产品。

作为被告李诉甲醛的家具标准，而原告实际上从过敏性紫癜紫癜性肾炎和中学与上述调查结果和分析相结合，因而受损害销售，鼓楼法院认为，原告蒙受紫癜性肾炎与甲醛超过诉争家具之间的相当因果关系。李被告的生产和销售甲醛超标的产品，存在的过错，应承担相应的民事责任。然而，原告自己特有过敏，而且这种疾病发生在一个公布其损害后果发生的根本原因有一定的原因，并应适当减轻李被告侵权责任人。有证据表明，原告，并为为2亿元人民币的损失是否符合法律支持法庭，但原告要求的后续治疗费用15万美元和其他要求，也没有法律依据，法院不予支持。

■链接

律师观点：让企业没有显示过多的甲醛

江苏圣律师事务所唐迎鸾律师认为，我们大多数人购买到家具甲醛或其他有毒气体的排放，如季度一般不能错过这个生病的表面症状，但有毒气体，也是对我们有害，不可避免地会不会导致或引发其他疾病，我们买家具或装饰的事情，他们应该和销售签订了合同必须建立在商定的内容甲醛和其他气体，不得超过国家标准，否则要求供应商承担合同，返回和间接损失的赔偿相应的违约责任，即使没有合同，也可要求在规定的说明卖方发票，不得超过了甲醛，以及违约责任的合同。

环境提醒：购买家具的检测疑似

消费者如何选择家具，购买家具，如何处理这个问题，记者采访了南京室内环境监测中心站李。她告诉记者，消费者在购买家具前，首先，这一消息是否有刺激性气味，异味，无刺激性气味，可让卖方出示有关的质量检验报告的17173家具。合格的检验报告，消费者未必完全有资格购买家具，主要是因为目前的监测机制，在一定程度上的漏洞存在，监督部门不应该对每个监测家具相同。李开复还对记者说，木制家具的监测，国家有严格的监测标准，即“GB18584 - 2001木家具有害物质限制标准”，该标准的室内木家具产品的使用提供需要有限的有害物质的测试方法和检验规则。本标准适用于室内木制家具各类产品的使用，消费者一旦怀疑购买家具的问题，可以委托该标准的质量检验，质检部门。并根据检查报告上法庭，要求索赔或返回业务。

Buy “green” closet but was suffering from nephritis家具商20,000 compensation

Nanjing, one young woman bought a used 6 closet, she fell on the immune system and often cold, the hospital diagnosed as allergic nephritis. By the relevant departments for furniture by the release of 17,173 to identify the amount of formaldehyde found excessive formaldehyde in 1 times. Young women一纸诉状将furniture and furniture operators sued the city to court and request compensation for the loss of 28.5 million yuan. Recently, Nanjing Gulou District Court of first instance verdict, the verdict furniture operators compensation of the damage to the plaintiff 2 million yuan and 11,000 yuan to refund the purchase price. After the verdicts, the original defendant did not appeal the ruling yesterday, has taken effect.
buy “green” closet after suffering from nephritis

According to the briefing, December 15, 2004, when 23-year-old Miss quarter to Nanjing, Nanjing Road, Jiangdong Town, a large furniture purchase cupboard door, a man named after the furniture meiyo stalls operating point of view of the Department of a six cabinet. Lee told her boss at the time, there are formal furniture manufacturers, materials used in full compliance with environmental protection, so do not worry, Miss quarter. Quarter believed Miss Lee boss, then spent 11,000 yuan to six cabinet bought back and placed in the bedroom, but the new cabinet a heavy chemical smell, the morning after getting up was Miss quarter dizziness brain up and began her not too much, thinking of new furniture油漆味focus will also be normal, not many care about.

time 1 day past, the furniture still smells of formaldehyde emissions from heavy, Miss quarter more and more serious symptoms, and weak physical phenomenon, and constantly cold. Shortly afterwards, she found that many parts of the body, such as bleeding skin allergy symptoms, immediately go to hospital for treatment, the doctor diagnosed as “Henoch-Schonlein purpura”, after drug treatment, his condition improved. Can not last, in June 2005 her illness once again attack by Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital diagnosed that she suffered from “Henoch-Schonlein nephritis,” Miss quarter of the total incidence of hospital six days. According to doctors, Miss quarter of a certain disease and has the relationship between pollution sources. Miss

quarter found themselves ill with the new furniture to buy, and then go to sell 17,173 of furniture to her boss Lee representations, Lee began her boss is not authorized to say, let Ms. quarter for evidence. After quarter of Miss Doctor diagnostic conclusions out to watch the boss Lee, Miss during the quarter and the request of the family under boss Lee 3900 yuan for the advance of medical and other expenses. Miss quarter’s condition can not turn for the better, after she transferred to Jiangsu Province, Chinese medicine hospital for treatment, but the treatment ineffective. Miss LEE quarter once again to find the boss to negotiate compensation issues, this time she can be thoroughly disappointed, the boss may be aware of Lee the gravity of the matter, do not want to take responsibility, have their own write-off of the operating department, and quit the city with the furniture rental venues to a三十六计away as.

closet formaldehyde emission standard to find less than double the

Lee boss, Miss quarter have continued hospitalization and treatment expensive. In desperation, Miss quarter will be “the problem of furniture” Nanjing commissioned by the Product Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quality, June 30, the inspection reports come out, test results for: submission of samples tested, formaldehyde emissions do not meet the national standard GB 18584-2001 “interior decoration material wood furniture Limit of Harmful Substances” standard requirements of the measured formaldehyde emission results of 3.0mg / L, and the required standards can not be greater than or equal to 1.5mg / L, sufficient formaldehyde emission Ultra-foot doubled. Furniture City

business皆称no responsibility

2006 years 8 months, quarter一纸诉状将Miss Lee as the site owner and the rental side of the furniture city sued Gulou District Court, claiming she was furniture and excessive formaldehyde serious disease of the loss of 285,300 yuan. Cases, the owner of Lee argued that Miss quarter from his purchase of the furniture is a fact, but the original has now canceled the operation. Miss quarter called him between the disease and there is no causal relationship between the law, but also in the purchase of furniture, Miss quarter before suffering from the disease claims. Out of humanitarian considerations, he had paid 3900 yuan the plaintiff, the court rejected the request of Miss quarter www.focus.cn litigation request. The defendant also argued that City Furniture, Furniture City and Lee boss lease relationship between the Department of counters, furniture made after the city charged to a reasonable extent, the quality of regulatory obligations. Miss quarter suffer from disease and excessive formaldehyde buy furniture not necessarily a causal relationship, their furniture before they buy with Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Commissioned for the quarter of Miss unilateral identification of the conclusions made, furniture city of non-acceptance. So Miss quarter loss claims, furniture city should not bear the ultimate liability.

not rule out the possibility of formaldehyde exceeded incentives are

cases, the two sides over the dispute, the court in accordance with the application of Miss quarter commissioned Nanjing Xin Shield judicial identification of the plaintiff by HSPN disputes and litigation furniture causal relationship between the availability of identification, identification analysis consider: Henoch-Schonlein purpura is a capillary-based allergic inflammatory disease, Henoch-Schonlein purpura diseases happen, and apart from environmental factors (climate, pollen, food, drugs , chemical materials, etc.) related to its nature as a result of the body’s immune system dysfunction, and their closely related to allergic constitution. After consultation with relevant medical experts, clinical indeed there have been similar cases, there existed a certain degree of clinical contact, but so far still lack relevant scientific basis, it suffered by Miss quarter nephritis with the formaldehyde exceeded 6 between the cabinet and should not clearly the existence of a direct causal relationship. However, formaldehyde as a specific irritant poison, are not rule out the possibility of its morbidity and lead to exacerbations incentives. Identification of staff also said that must be met anaphylactoid purpura allergens, allergic physique two conditions, the two conditions are indispensable; formaldehyde standard allergens are one of excessive formaldehyde plus physical cause allergic anaphylactoid purpura; current The plaintiff can not be sure of diseases caused by formaldehyde superscalar, but can not be ruled out as the toxic gas formaldehyde may increase the plaintiff or as a risk factor for disease exists.

consumers in favor of 2 million yuan compensation

after several hearings, Nanjing Gulou District People’s Court has first instance verdict. Courts consider, in accordance with the relevant evidence, the defendant can be sure that the sales network Lee v. super woman furniture for formaldehyde emission limits for the country twice, the existence of defects in product quality for substandard products.

sales as a result of the defendant Lee v. formaldehyde standard for furniture, and the plaintiff has actually suffered from Henoch-Schonlein purpura Henoch-Schonlein nephritis and secondary, combined with the above findings and analysis, Gulou court finds that the plaintiff suffered Henoch-Schonlein nephritis and formaldehyde exceeded furniture v. indisputable causal relationship between the considerable. Lee accused the production and sale of formaldehyde exceeded the standard products, the existence of fault shall bear corresponding civil liability. However, the plaintiff’s own idiosyncratic allergic, but also by the disease occurred in an essential reason for the occurrence of the consequences of its damage has certain reasons, and should be appropriate to mitigate the defendant owner of Lee’s tort liability. There is evidence that the plaintiff, and in conformity with the law for the loss of a total of 2 million yuan to support the court, but the plaintiff requested a follow-up treatment costs 15 million and other requirements, there is no legal basis, the court not to support it.

■ link

lawyers point of view: Let businesses do not indicate excessive formaldehyde

Jiangsu Sacred Law Firm Tang Ying-Luan counsel’s view, most of us bought a formaldehyde or other toxic gas emissions over the furniture, like the quarter is generally not Miss This apparent symptoms of illness, but the toxic gas is also harmful to us, inevitably will not cause or trigger other diseases, we buy furniture or decorating to do, they should and sales signed a contract must be agreed upon the content of formaldehyde and other gases should not exceed the national standards, and failing that vendors undertake corresponding liability for breach of contract, return and compensation for consequential loss, even if there is no contract, it may require the vendor in the invoice note prescribed shall not be exceeded that of formaldehyde, as well as liability for breach of contract.

environmental Reminder: buy furniture to Detect Suspected

consumers how to choose furniture, buy furniture, how to deal with the problem, this reporter interviewed the interior Nanjing Environmental Monitoring Center Station Lee. She told reporters, before consumers buy furniture, first of all, whether the news has pungent odor smell, no pungent odors, may allow the seller to produce furniture of the 17,173 reports related to quality inspection. Qualified inspection report, consumers may not be fully qualified to buy furniture, mainly because of the current monitoring mechanisms that exist in a certain degree of vulnerability, monitoring departments should not do the same on each monitor furniture. Lee also told reporters that the monitoring for the wooden furniture, the state has a rigid monitoring of standards, that is, “GB18584-2001 wood furniture Limit of Harmful Substances standards”, the standard provides for the use of interior wood furniture products require a limited amount of harmful substances test methods and inspection rules. This standard applies to the use of various types of interior wood furniture products, consumers buy once suspected the problem of furniture can be commissioned this quality inspection departments of quality inspection standards. And in accordance with the inspection report to court to request or return business claims. (07-11-6)

Tags: formaldehyde, furniture, miss, quarter