INDUSTRY

美国政府对美国众议院分别通过了消费品安全法不同的版本，最近提出异议，政府的反对，概述如下。

政府反对参议院法案关于赋予的权力国家检察机构的规定。政府认为，应该有统一的国家标准，以保障消费者利益，确保国家管制的一致性，业界也有规可循。

参议院法案，揭露问题，供应链的工作人员提供保护，但政府认为，这一规定将导致在无意义的诉讼大幅增加私营机构的雇主，可能会影响美国消费者产品安全委员会在其执行能力职能。

政府反对一切措施法案，通过立法规定和条例的个别产品开发，消费者产品安全委员会应通过一项正式裁决程序，采用的产品标准。此外，应与新标准，使制造商，供应商和零售商充分的过渡时期一致。

参议院法案从2009年1月1日的规定，对销售，制造和含有的儿童产品，某些类型的邻苯二甲酸盐的进口禁令。政府认为，在科学确定的情况下，一个特定产品的禁令之前，可能会导致制造商使用非规范性的替代品，可能危及儿童的健康。

参议院法案包括一项规定，禁止由制造系统号9503-9505玩具协会下列公司进口：（1）产品的生产制造有可能构成重大危险玩具公司;（2）一旦制造玩具构成威胁公众公司，局势的严重性，导致消费者产品安全委员会举行了该公司负责实施永久禁止。政府认为，这项规定太含糊，不够精确，只为进口产品，不包括本地产品，歧视造成的，并可能导致对美国产品的主要贸易伙伴采取同样的限制。

The United States Government is opposed to Senate House of Representatives passed the Consumer Product Safety Act

The United States Government of the United States House of Representatives each passed different versions of the Consumer Goods Safety Act recently raised objections, the Government’s objections are outlined below.

the Government opposes the Senate bill regarding the powers conferred on a state prosecutor provisions. Government believes that there should be uniform national standards to protect consumer interests, ensure that national regulatory consistency, the industry also has rules to be followed.

Senate bill to expose the problem of supply chain staff to provide protection, but the Government believes that this provision will lead to private employers for a substantial increase in litigation of frivolous, it may affect the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s ability in carrying out its functions.

Government opposes the bill in all initiatives to develop through legislative provisions and regulations of individual products that the Consumer Product Safety Commission should adopt a formal award procedures to adopt product standards. Furthermore, it should be in line with the new standard to give manufacturers, suppliers and retailers adequate transition period.

the Senate bill has provisions from January 1, 2009, the ban on the sale, manufacture and import of certain types containing phthalates in children’s products. Government believes that in the absence of scientific certainty that a particular product before the ban could lead manufacturers to use non-regulatory alternative to chemicals, may endanger the health of children.

Senate bill includes a provision prohibiting the importation of the following companies by the Association for Manufacturing System No. 9503-9505 Toys: (1) the continued manufacture of products may constitute a significant risk of toy companies; (2) once the manufacture of toys pose a risk to the public company, the seriousness of the situation led to Consumer Product Safety Commission held responsible for the company to implement a permanent ban. The Government considers that this provision is too vague and not precise enough, and only for imported products, does not include local products, resulting in discrimination, and may lead to major trading partners of the United States Products take the same restrictions.
(08-9-3)